Lalo

I seem to gather this guy doesn't really know much about America or American politics, but nevertheless he's usually quite accurate for an atheist on political/racial issues which is rare. I noticed so many atheists are led by their hatred of religion & associate 'right wing' with religion & often are completely one eyed due to this. Hitchens, Douglas Murray, Ayaan probably best 3 atheists for political stuff I've seen.

In UK, US etc. Religious Christians are all over the place. Tons of Christians are bleeding heart left liberals/socialists...and many are more conservative.

The worst people on any issue are progressives because they never know what they're talking about & use misleading tactics & wording on purpose because they hate reality. They love race wars, they love identity politics, they love all that nonsense that is a plague to society.

Black Lives Matter is NOT a left wing movement and never has been. It is propped up & supported by progressive types who naturally dislike the state, the police the military & blame imperialism for all ills, plus they see racism in everything so it's evident they'd take up this stupidity, recently a prank to see if they'd support painting the white house brown to stop offending minorities saw hundreds of them sign a petition in hours. They are beyond help on these issues. So it can be seen as leftish, but to most blacks involved, they'd not describe it as left wing or right wing or any direction wing. Just pro black.

There was an article written by a moron who simply tried to castigate a girl as an uncle tom for being black and Christian. Which is pretty astounding given most blacks in the US the vast majority are Christian. So labelling them all uncle toms for having the 'white man's religion' is really more toxic identity shaming which really causes so much harm. Any black Republican, any black person not seen as 'black enough' is often insulted racially by blacks, it is quite nasty but all too common.

These girls that hijacked the Bernie Sanders stage were not infiltrators, they are leaders of their cities black lives matter movement....

The progressive article digged through her facebook & found a Sarah Palin mention & decided ''She once liked Sarah Palin shows how morally stupid she is + she's a Christian, God isn't real, she's dumb that's why she attacked Bernie, we're your allies know your place and stfu or you'll lose us''

Unfortunately the Sarah Palin mention is the only thing ever that can be found in her whole FB comments that's even slightly indicative of ever being a GOP or right wing or Conservative & that post appears to be a joke.

She indicates the GOP should have groomed her when she had a Sarah Palin button, now they've lost her to the other side. Sarah Palin was back in 07/08 and she looks young in her late teens early 20's now, so if we presume it's not some kind of joke or inside joke she was maybe 13 or 14 at this time?

That's literally the only mention of anything conservative/gop/right wing in a positive light. Even that she makes fun of with 'on the other side' and 'faints remember Jesus is the Lord' when someone says Palin 2016, basically saying Jesus is the Lord it'll never happen, phew.

The rest of her FB is basically black supremacist madness. Anti white stuff everywhere. Pro transsexual, pro gay, & many many remarks that clearly show she is far far away from a Conservative.

Comparing Conservatives to the KKK only a few days ago.

The thing people have to understand most blacks in the US vote or side democrats by default. They view fox news & conservatives as racist & thus they automatically side with the other. But they don't necessarily have much love for democrats either in many cases. Looking through her FB she believes ONLY black people should lead the black lives matter movement & she seems pretty anti white and also is suspicious of liberal whites as well as hateful of conservative whites. So her actions are pretty consistent with her views.

I don't have any time or respect for idiots like her, however the whole ''Uncle Tom'' claims at her for being a Christian is literally the maddest response to what she did. She never never went there talking about Christianity, she went there blabbering about black lives matter. She's a radical black supremacist.  The whole ''Blacks shouldn't be Christians'' is totally a racist wrong approach to what she did. It's literally just as bad as her. She views things from a racially blinded way & so does the moron who wrote that article.

He literally dug up things from her FB and presented them in a way which the audience reading would then get a skewed version of reality so his own bigotry & racism would be overlooked.

Quite simply the black lives matter movement is a black supremacist black thuggish movement where a lot of clueless white intersectional feminist types & professional protesters have joined in to protest racism against blacks that mostly doesn't exist.

Mike Brown robbed a store & then attacked a cop & was shot in self defense.

Blacks believe he was walking away with his hands up when he was shot...which was proved false. 

Recently Sandra Bland killed herself in jail & blacks believe the police killed her, which is just factually all wrong.

And so on & so on.  There's some legitimate cases, but racism has certainly never been proved in any case, never has a hate crime come about. It's mostly paranoia. Statistics show whites are killed 3x more by the cops. & commit suicide in jail 8x more. But the facts do not matter. There is a toxic narrative on twitter & so on by mostly race baiters & many uninformed people just roll with it, they assume it be real if all these people are upset, but it's really not.

The idea this or these women were Conservative to anyone who knows this shit is insane. Right now The Clinton campaign is trying to court Deray to capture the black vote & some suspected it was Clinton's campaign that put these girls up to it. I was 50/50 on that but after looking at her FB, I just think she's crazy & wants attention for her pro black bullshit.

She's also been doing this black lives matter shit for the full year since Mike Brown's death.

The logical breakdown - Female Muslim

As a man of logic, sound logic, factual rational logic, I like to ask questions & say things that expose how illogical other people's ideas or beliefs are simply to replay back to them and see if they get it.

I came across a Muslim girl on twitter...

She was shown a picture by another twitter user of females with acid thrown in their face referring to what Islam causes. Her response was interesting. She said...

''It's the family mentality & NOT what the religion teaches us, you fool''

Now for those of us theologically literate we know that actually it is what Islam teaches but that's irrelevant. She(possibly trying to compensate) suggests it's the family mentality & essentially not Islam.

So here she is saying to ignore family mentality's/culture & only focus on what Islam teaches.

So here is where I said..well Islam teaches a man can beat his wife...Referring to ...

Here it clearly says women should be obedient to their husbands and if they are not eventually you can strike/beat them. 

^ Going by her logic she has to now accept that Islam teaches Muslims men can beat their wives & hence if a husband beats his wife that is Islam. That is what Islam teaches. That is a direct consequence of Islam. However here was her response...

She says yes men can beat their wives BUT only if it wont hurt them(something not actually said at all) and just a soft tap for a 'reminder' 

A reminder to be obedient I presume?

Anyway to break down her logic. She has decided to add something not in the text to make the text seem less horrible & more reasonable. Which is ''IF IT WONT HURT THEM''

However in doing that she negated to actually comprehend what she was suggesting.

Men can beat their wives softly if they're not obedient to remind them to be obedient...

^ That is her logic. And that's her trying to make it seem good.

So in Islam a husband is like a parent & a wife is like a child. The child must obey their parents & the wife must obey their husband?  The child gets spanked if they do something bad & the wife gets beaten(softly supposedly) if they are not obedient...

Isn't that a very odd backward unfair oppressive relationship? Well yes...quite clearly.

Which is very strange when you consider the tweet which led me to reply to her originally..

< full tweet

She says women are on a HIGHER level in Islam & Islam never oppresses them...

So is a child on a higher level to it's parents?  Certainly the parents job is to protect their child. But really who is on a higher level the child or the child's parents?

Who is in charge?
Who gets more respect?
Who makes the rules?
Who guides the other?
Who makes the decisions?
Does a child have true freedom? No....
                                           

A child is under the control/guidance of their parents.

And in Islam as this woman testifies the wife is under the control/guidance of her husband.

Therefore logically speaking her original tweet is laughable. Islam clearly oppresses women as it treats them like children not adults.

She claimed Islam puts women HIGHER than men.
Yet wives should be obedient to their husbands...
Daughters obedient to their father/parents....
So at what point are women higher than men?

Clearly the person obedient is lower.
Muslims themselves are obedient to 'Allah' Because 'Allah' is above them.
Likewise in school the children are below the teacher hence they follow what the teacher says.
Likewise in employment the employee is below the boss & does what the boss says.
And in Islam the wife is obedient to her husband and does what he says..
So men are higher(by her own logic) if we follow what Islam says(following her claim on what Islam says)

So why is she lying to herself?  Well - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance